Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 IP
[Thinkgroup or me change.
It breaks my heart.
Is this only time when I experience my heart?
The living heart is always on fire.
The heart is always trying to resolve its contradictions.]
[Thinkgroup or me change.
It breaks my heart.
Is this only time when I experience my heart?
The living heart is always on fire.
The heart is always trying to resolve its contradictions.]
[How long could coherence last if the potential inherent in me1a is brought to life by a thinkgroup illuminating ‘my mirror of the world3a’?
Disconnects build up.
Thinkgroup changes.
I change.]
[The general term ‘obligations’ contains both ‘responsibility’ and ‘words’.
Responsibility stands in contrast to words.
Both are categorical transitions within the intersection.
Both go with the horizontal nested form:
Thought experiment3H(my choice2V and something2H(__1H))
Here is the arena of free choice, for good or evil.
Here is where the obligation is forged as either responsibility or delusion.]
[Even stranger, do the terms ‘responsibility versus words’ coincide with the terms ‘lawacceptance versus lawdenial’?]
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[Obligations parallel the horizontal axis pair:
Lawessential3H( human thoughts2V and human actions2H(_1H))
Or:
Lawessential3H( what is good and what is bad2( _1H))
Do these look compatible?
Do obligations parallel the essence of the law?]
[Let me compare this to ‘the message underlying the word ‘religion’‘.]
[A recommended electronic text in regards to the Progressive word-based mind:
James Ostrowski, Progressivism: A Primer on the Idea Destroying America, 2014, Buffalo, New York: Cazenovia Books, first edition, ISBN 978-0974253-87]
[What do I mean by the term “words”?
Listen to the promises of Progressive politicians.
Listen to the reporting of Progressive news organizations.
Read the legalese packed into the thousands of pages in a single piece of Progressive legislation.
Listen to the Professor’s concerns about the sensitivities of others.
Read the twisted logic of Progressive so-called social scientists.
These “words” do not liberate.
They shackle.]