[So I pray (or think about it).

The interscope becomes an intersection.

The non-contemplative acts.

The contemplative prays.]

[Now, I want to go one step deeper.

What is this thought experiment_3a that brings something (some content)_2a into relation with the potential inherent in me_1a?

If I only consider the actuality of something_2a, then neither the thought experiment_3a nor the potential of me_1a are apparent.

They become apparent in the interscope.]

Summary of text [comment] page 83

[At this time, think^divine clearly broadcasts into the thought experiment.

One Triune God illuminates the mirror of the world when our delusional clouds temporary give way to clear skies.]

[Think^group or me change.

It breaks my heart.

Is this only time when I experience my heart?

The living heart is always on fire.

The heart is always trying to resolve its contradictions.]

[How long could coherence last if the potential inherent in me_1a is brought to life by a think^group illuminating ‘my mirror of the world_3a’?

Disconnects build up.

Think^group changes.

I change.]

[The general term ‘obligations’ contains both ‘responsibility’ and ‘words’.

Responsibility stands in contrast to words.

Both are categorical transitions within the intersection.

Both go with the horizontal nested form:

Thought experiment_3H(my choice_2V and something_2H(___1H))

Here is the arena of free choice, for good or evil.

Here is where the obligation is forged as either responsibility or delusion.]

[Even stranger, do the terms ‘responsibility versus words’ coincide with the terms ‘law^acceptance versus law^denial’?]