Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XD
[Some of the intersections have an alternating (either/or) or dual (and) vertical or horizontal axis. Some have an either/or single actuality.]
07/15/19
Category Archives: message underlying religion
07/12/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XC
[Intersections contain two co-oppositions.
Four co-opposed termini intersect in actuality, forming a key image in Jungian psychology: the mandala.]
07/11/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XB
[I proposed three intersecting nested forms so far:
- The message underlying the word ‘religion’
- The tension between ‘me recognizing myself as created in the image of God’ and ‘my human nature is to participate in divine nature’
- The thought experiment where ‘I choose something’
The last two derive from two-level intersections.]
07/10/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XA
Summary of text [comment] pages 86 and 87
[The intersecting nested form stimulates social construction.
A single actuality is produced by the intersection of two nested forms, one vertical (tending to be more visible, yet immaterial) and one horizontal (tending to be more hidden, yet material).]
07/9/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 WZ
[I proposed 2 two-level interscopes so far:
- The psychology of the person created in the image of God
- The thought experiment where ‘I choose something’
The concept of co-oppositions first appears with this model.]
03/11/19
03/8/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 TQ
[Despite the inadequate wording, what a resonance imply?
Maybe, what is good and what is bad2( free will1V)) complements heart2(free will1V)).
Would this fit Schoonenberg’s claim that free will becomes liberty when deeds are bound to God and becomes servitude when deeds are bound to sin, law or death?]
03/7/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 TP
Summary of text [comment] pages 83 and 84
[I compare the intersecting forms of the thought experiment where I choose ‘something’ and the message underlying the word “religion”.
I find that something that I may choose1V parallels consciencespecified1V.
I feel that I should label this parallel: Free will.
Perhaps the word “parallels” is insufficient.
How about complements or resonates with?]
03/6/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 TO
[Free will, consciencespecified1V, points to ideas inside of me.
From this potential, ‘what is good and what is bad2’ emerges. This actuality points to the world outside of me.]
03/1/19
