[The mirror of the world_3a reflects a symbolic order_3a.

Responsibilities and words express the character of ‘a system of…_3a’.

Correspondingly, the potentials within me_1a are already refined, cut into interpellations, finite in number, because they well up in response to the normal context configured as ‘a system of…_3a’.

Freedom and bondage express the character of ‘… differences_1a’.

Both obligations and exercises of the heart share an actuality_2a that corresponds to an utterance, emerging from and situating the potentials inherent in me.]

[What is to be found in the thought experiment_3a?

The thought experiment_3a is the content-level normal context.

Like the system…_3a in _parole, the thought experiment_3a seems to be referential.

We project referentiality into the thought experiment.

But, it also exists as a symbolic order.

The system…_3a sets the normal context for the potentiation of …differences_1a.

Parole_2a exists as a system of differences_3a-1a.]

[Have I arrived at another way to speculate about responsibility (in virtue) and words (in sin)? ]

Summary of text [comment] page 83

[The previous blog leads me to what Schoonenberg wrote next:]

The free choice, for good or evil, always implies some obligation. We exercise our freedom in serving God or Satan.

[What does that mean for the mandala of the heart?]