09/24/19

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 ZA

[One may dispute these nested formulations. Perhaps, one can claim that the thought experiment should be left out of the picture. However, to me, that runs against a key observation: Choice and the something that can be chosen are two independent actualities.

So, the thought experiment where ‘I choose something’ became a model.

This is not the only way to approach Schoonenberg’s difficult and condensed text. It is the route that I explored.]

09/19/19

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 YX

[What did I find?

Two actualities were evident: the event of the choice2 and the actuality of something2.

Two actualities implied two nested forms: I choose something and a thought experiment where something forms in my mind. The former goes with the event. The latter goes with the actuality of something.

Thus, the idea of ‘I choose something’ became the thought experiment where ‘I choose something’.]