[Before going back to text, I want to note that I have adopted a format of “summary of text [comment] page number”.   The text is very dense.  Some paragraphs are like scrolls that unroll the moment that you set eyes on them.

Here is the fine print:

The date corresponds to the year the imprimatur was given for orginal Dutch version by J. Terpstra S.J., Praep. Prov. Neerl.

The page numbers are from the 1965 edition of Man and Sin: A Theological View, published by Notre Dame Press.

Imprimatur for English translation was given in 1965 by Timothy A. Jurtin S.J., Vice Provincial, New York.]

[Why can’t think^group recognize the natural consequences of the transgressions that it contextualizes?

Why can’t think^group resist the wants and needs that fuel the transgressions?

In short, why is think^group blind to law^essential and unaware of their facilitation of unruly dispositions?

I am not sure.  It may have something to do with the exclusivity of symbolic orders. Each think^group lives in its own bubble.

In contrast, law^essential is, what it is, irrespective of think^group and conscience^lacking.]