[When can a researcher know whether the interscope or intersection applies to the conditions of the survey?]

Summary of text [comment] pages 87 and 88

[What about surveys where the intersection applies?

What about surveys where ‘the something that I may choose_1V’ does not correspond to ‘the something that emerges from and situates me_2H’?]

[Psychologists only can claim that survey measurements represent ‘the potentials inherent in the subject under investigation_1a’ under the conditions where the interscope applies. Surveys only apply to sensible construction.]

[Base-level bias must exist in social science experiments because the researcher defines the thought experiment_3a that stimulates a response in the subject_1a.

The response (the upwelling of potential in the subject_1a plus the potential of the survey to impose constraints_1b) always conforms to the stimulus (the normal contexts_3a&3b that the event occurs in).

This also explains why many social scientists rely on deception. Deception has the same character as bias.   All experiments exhibit ‘base-level deception.]

Summary of text [comment] pages 87 and 88

[The psychologist may think that “he” is measuring my mental potential_1a as if it were an actuality. After all, on the situation level, the content level nested form is packaged as the possibility of something that the subject might choose_1b.

The psychologist may not imagine that “he” is measuring the hidden features in the actuality in the thought experiment where ‘I choose something’.]

[The only other actuality is ‘my choice_2b’.

This item can legitimately be observed and measured because it belongs to the realm of actuality twice, as situation and as element in a nested form.

Again, the researcher is concealed in the way that the survey can be marked.

For example, the researcher may have already limited possibility_1b to a choice from 1 to 5.]