Summary of text [comment] page 19

[From the previous blog, God judges the deceased person.

In order to hold ‘him’ responsible, God reifies the soul as a person.  Conscience^specified₁ and the person’s trained dispositions₁ (the person’s soul) re-animate a body (site of action), constituting a person. In that re-animation, the person is judged.

What does that mean?

First, consider that, at the time of Judgment, the thirdness of the intersecting nested form is law^essential₃ (since acceptance or denial are no longer pertinent) and think^divine₃ (since any particular think^group has passed away long before the Resurrection).

Second, consider the way that a normal context works.  In our everyday lives, “law^essential₃ and think^divine₃” bring “a body, the site of human action₂” into relation with “the potential in one’s conscience^specified₁ and trained (but still natural) dispositions₁“.

Third, consider what these two points imply: A normal context judges as it brings the person into the realm of actuality.

This logic applies to everyday life and to any post-mortem existence for humans.  No matter what one imagines the constitution of existence after death, a judgment must occur, because the normal contexts of the afterlife are necessarily different than the normal contexts of everyday life.]