Summary of text [comment] page 22

The “No of sin” shows itself in two forms: refusal and usurpation.  Each form includes the other.

[Here, I see Schoonenberg pointing to the nature of infrasovereign religions from a suprasovereign perspective.

The suprasovereign religion exists despite the exercise of sovereign power. It interpellates a great diversity of institutions.  These institutions are religious and capable of seeking sovereign power, but most do not even contemplate that objective. The religion^{infrasovereign}s that grasp for sovereign power may have been originally interpellated into existence by religion^{suprasovereign}. Or they may have not.

Think^divine interpellates in more social dimensions than think^{infrasovereign_religions}.]