Summary of text [comment] page 22

[Religion^{suprasovereign} interpellates the think^groups. Think^divine calls to people open to conversion, people who are capable of abandoning their think^group.  People can see when a think^group denies the consequences of its actions.  People sense the Real (law^essential).

The call of religion^{suprasovereign} can lead to conflict with sovereign^{infrareligion}.

Some religions^{infrasovereign} refuse think^divine on the basis of some “object that they hold dear”.   The object serves to elevate the (infra)sovereign think^group and demonize its perceived opponents.  The object inspires the movement to grasp sovereign power.  In doing so, the movement usurps precisely “what the supra-sovereign religion would guide” and places an object (an organizational goal) in the place of God (the relation that call everyone).

I call this usurpation: think^pro-object.]