Summary of text [comment] page 39
[Co-emergent with the success of a sovereign thinkgroup is the conjuring of the relation of impossibility between the denial of lawessential and acceptance of lawessential.
Denials come in many forms. “The deformative results of pro-object deeds may be exceptions to the mundane world of unintended consequences. Unintended results are due to those who harbor anti-object ideologies. The causes reside in those with false consciousness. The only option must be to even more dogmatically establish the idol of pro-object and more relentlessly punish the ones who are responsible for failure.”]