[Second, let me look at moral evil:
Moral evilphysical2(1): __3( human acts create situation2( moral evil proceeds – through intentionality – from the – immature – person1 …)
Moral evilmetaphysical3(2): … determines “subject1” as a person3 – in need of conversion – & determines status of subject(3)( limitations under the situation2 ( __1 )
Can I associate moral evilmetaphysical to a context that possesses a depth, longevity and destructive power that is greater than natural evilmetaphysical?
For moral evil, status of the subject(3) is not the only property determined. The status of subject1 is also judged to be a person3. Thus, an intersubjective relation necessarily accompanies the determination. Here is the site of the depth, duration and destruction. One context contains both perpetrator and victim.
Consider the relation between a town and an earthquake fault line. There is no intersubjective relation between the two.
Consider the relation between a criminal and a victim. There an intersubjective relation between the two.
This relation has no bottom, it endures, and it can be totally destructive.]