Summary of text [comment] pages 46 & 47
Schoonenberg argued that this added “level” [now “dimension”] of morals and freedom does not have the character of “statistical necessity”.
[The complete intersecting nested form, as developed in prior blogs, may be helpful.
Take the last point first.
The horizontal axis of lawessential3(human action2(disposition1)) has the character of de Chardin’s “statistical necessity”; including, both metaphysical (limitations) and physical (challenges) evil.
Lawessential3(human action2((disposition1)) also encompasses interscoping nested forms, covering a range of nested forms, each with its own natural evils.
This explains a question that I have held since formulating the idea of “intersecting nested forms”: Why do they appear to apply to a wide range of topics, including individuals, institutions, and societies?
Well. this would be expected if the horizontal axis of the intersecting nested forms interscoped.
The horizontal axis of the intersecting nested forms interscopes with other nested forms.]