Pride(concupiscence(death)).  Wow.

Accuse me of over-interpretation.  Zimmerman actually does not present the thesis, aesthetic relation and question that I project upon his text.  At least I used the word “unwitting”.

Maybe I should have used the word “crypto-“, like “Zimmerman’s text supports a cryptothesis that becomes evident from the perspective gained in An Archaeology of the Fall.”

Accuse me of postmodernism.   What can be projected onto the text often turns out to be as relevant as the text itself.