0022  From the prior blogs, I arrive at a two-level interscope.

0023 The crux of Turbon’s article resides in the last sentence of the abstract.

Whatever_2a makes humans distinctive_1a in the normal context of evolution_3a should be “digestible” by whatever_2b makes humans distinctive_1b in the normal context of our own intuition_3b.

0024 Turbon’s appeal fails when evolution₃ excludes intuition₃.

Turbon’s appeal will succeed when evolution_3a and intuition_3b align.

0025 In order to be “digestible”, scientific origins of human beings_2a ought to be capable of being virtually situated by a coherent origins_2b, arising from the potential of ‘something distinctive’_1b, in the normal context of human intuition_3b.

What disciplines guide human intuition_3b?

Philosophy and theology.