0034 On the situation level, animals prepare to act_2b.

In contrast, humans generate phantasms_2b.  What does the thing or event_2a mean to me_3b?

0035 But, I am not alone.

Therefore, moral meaning plays out in my phantasm_2b. The objective object_2b may not necessarily trigger action.  But, it_2b activates a moral order.  It triggers an intersubjective being_2b.

On one hand, the intersubjective being_2b is contiguous with the objective mind-dependent being_2b and may be willing to face the test of suprasubjectivity_1c.

A phantasm_2b will not suffer privation, when its intersubjective reality_1b seeks to be contextualized by suprasubjective potential_1c.

On the other hand, a phantasm_2b may be stated as blather_2a.  Instead of facing the test of suprasubjectivity_1c, the phantasm_2b comes out as an event, a statement_2a, that seeks to be objectified_1b as agreement_1a.  Agreement_1a coordinates perceptions_2b and appears to support an intersubjective reality_2b that does not need to face the test of suprasubjectivity_1c.

After all, if we all agree_1a, it_2b must be true_1c, doesn’t it_2b?

This phantasm_2b suffers privation, because intersubjective reality_1b should be elevated to its suprasubjective potential_1c.

Instead, it_2b seeks agreement_1a, through its own expression_2a, in the presence of others.

The observer plans to go to law school.

0036 The graduate student, in some capacity (remember, alcohol is consumed at these parties), knows this.

So, inadvertently, “he” brings what the observer says to generate agreement_1a into the suprasubjective realm_1c, by questioning “her” opinion.

0037 Here is a picture of the resulting judgment_2c.