0056 The fourth primer introduces the organization tier.

The organization_B tier occupies the slot for actuality in a primal nested form.

The individual in community_A tier occupies the slot for possibility.

An unnamed upper_C tier labels the slot for normal context.

0057 Why is the upper_C tier not named?

Of course, the third_C tier has a label.

But, as soon as a label occupies the slot for normal context, the actuality of the organization_B tier gets turned.  The current term is “spin”.  For example, corporate media “spins” the “narrative”, into which organization_B-tier actualities appear to fit.

The issue of “spin” presents a great challenge for the disciplines of economics and sociology, which aim to scientifically study the phenomena of organizations.  Academics are tempted to judge the organization_B tier, as if the thing itself_B could be ethically evaluated.

0058 Take a look at the nested form for the organization_B tier.

Assessment_3B brings transactions_2B into relation with the potential of ‘people working together’_1B.

What do these words mean?

Every term tells a story.

Consequently, each element in the partially differentiated relational structure expands into a nested form, resulting in a three-level interscope.

Organization_B is not differentiated.

The nested form of assessment_3B, exchange_2B and ‘working together’_1B is partially differentiated.

The interscope with the levels of assessment_cB, exchange_bB and ‘working together’_aB is fully differentiated.