For the sins of sensuality and gluttony, Progressive think^group was “on the side of the sinner” in that it largely told the sinner what she wanted to hear.

This began to change in the section on anger.

Progressive cryptotheological think^group justifies rudeness, violence and aggression by the politically correct person.

However, at the same time, Progressive think^group repudiates rudeness against the politically incorrect person.

Progressive think^group projects a think^incorrect and conscience^incorrect onto the person who commits an act of rudeness, aggression or violence.  That is, Progressives presume that the politically incorrect actor adheres to an incorrect ideology and has a false conscience.  Thus, the politically incorrect actor should be “scapegoated”.

In contrast, the politically correct actor should be “golden calfed”.

In this instance, think^group does not stand in opposition to think^divine.  Rather, it casts itself as think^divine (or as think^correct) against the empty-set (straw man) think^incorrect. Think^incorrect would (theoretically) have to exist if the action were to be politically incorrect.