[What does it mean for sovereign power to impose an object that brings the subject into organization.

The imposition forcibly reduces both the responsibilities and the freedoms of the subject.

What does the subject gain from this exchange?

Some would argue that everyone (the collective) gains by the good inherent in the object (such as a reduction in health care costs, greater health benefits, and so on, all deriving from the cessation of cigarette smoking).

That argument, however, merely re-asserts the intention of the pro-object. It ignores the subjective impact on the individual.]

[There is more potential in me_1a than can be reflected by any human-instituted mirror of the world_3a.

Conversion increases the person’s responsibility and freedom.

Regulation reduces the person’s responsibility and freedom.]

[The Progressive desires to organize opposition to tobacco products.

The Progressive pretends that a healthy lifestyle is an object that brings the individual into organization.

Is that Satanic?

No, if it aims to build the person’s character, to inform “him” of the consequences of “his” actions.

Yes, if it aims to impose the object^organization upon the individual through sovereign power.

The former builds a person of greater responsibility and freedom.

The latter does not.]

[When I smoke habitually, my entire heart may grow larger.

I may convince myself that I am brave and accept responsibility.

But I know that I, seat of choice_3V, have chosen recklessly.

My own heart₂ betrays what I could have been_1V.]