Summary of text [comment] page 88
[Perhaps, for the interscope, the scenario should be:
With a light source, I attend to something.
I do not really realize that I am seeing. Seeing is just part of the ongoing operation. My attention acts as a driver.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[The intersection works because ‘the something that specular scatters light2a’ does not really emerge from and situate ‘my neurophysiological capabilities1a’.
It only does so when I, seat of sight3b, commands the situation.
When my command falters, I may ask the question: What am I looking at?]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[The interscope works when ‘my attention’ seamlessly selects a particular item that specular scatters light. In other words, my situational attention3b directs my neurophysiological potential1a towards a content level something2a. This is the only way for a thing to emerge from and situate my neurological potentials.
I, seat of sight3b, virtually emerges from and situates the origin and the nature of the illumination3a. Under typical conditions, I do not even notice the ‘I see’ nested formb. I unhesitatingly attend to something2a.]
[I, seat of sight3, brings my attention2 into relation with the possibilities inherent in ‘light specular scattering from the surface of something stimulating my neurophysiological potential’1.
A light source3 brings some thing that actually specular scatters photons2 into relation to my visual neurophysiological potential1.
These two nested forms may interscope or intersect.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[Let me reconsider a natural analogy:
With a light source, ‘I see something’.
As before, there are two actualities: ‘I see’ and ‘the something that I see’.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[Given these two nested forms, there are several ways to bring them into relation, including intersection or interscope. Here are two ways to do that.]
