[I, seat of sight3, brings my attention2 into relation with the possibilities inherent in ‘light specular scattering from the surface of something stimulating my neurophysiological potential’1.
A light source3 brings some thing that actually specular scatters photons2 into relation to my visual neurophysiological potential1.
These two nested forms may interscope or intersect.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[Let me reconsider a natural analogy:
With a light source, ‘I see something’.
As before, there are two actualities: ‘I see’ and ‘the something that I see’.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[Given these two nested forms, there are several ways to bring them into relation, including intersection or interscope. Here are two ways to do that.]
[One may dispute these nested formulations. Perhaps, one can claim that the thought experiment should be left out of the picture. However, to me, that runs against a key observation: Choice and the something that can be chosen are two independent actualities.
So, the thought experiment where ‘I choose something’ became a model.
This is not the only way to approach Schoonenberg’s difficult and condensed text. It is the route that I explored.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[Here are the two nested forms:
‘I, seat of choice3’ brings ‘my choice2’ into relation to the ‘possibilities inherent in something1’.
‘The thought experiment3’ brings ‘something2’ into relation to ‘the possibilities inherent in me1.]
[The thought experiment defines the normal context on the content level of two interscoping nested forms.
I, seat of choice, defines the normal context on the situation level of two interscoping nested forms.]
[What did I find?
Two actualities were evident: the event of the choice2 and the actuality of something2.
Two actualities implied two nested forms: I choose something and a thought experiment where something forms in my mind. The former goes with the event. The latter goes with the actuality of something.
Thus, the idea of ‘I choose something’ became the thought experiment where ‘I choose something’.]
Summary of text [comment] page 88
[The title of section 3 of chapter 2 is The Inclination to Evil.
But, Schoonenberg’s real topic is freedom.
My challenge was to examine this topic using nested forms.
So, I began my nested analysis the idea of ‘I choose something’.]
