[The bad ones are often portrayed as crazed serial killers.
After all, who is more anti-victim than a crazed serial killer (especially, one who is a projection of thinkpro-victim‘s tortured phantasms)? ]
[Who are these monsters?
They are competent people who do not consider themselves either golden calves or alienated victims. Plus, they do not watch Progressive TV.
These competent people are the true scapegoats.
They are often portrayed as incredibly greedy business people. They are depicted as swindlers so greedy that they will cheat any victim out of her ornaments in return for nothing (in the same way that television cheats the viewer-victim’s time).
These “businessmen” are only projections of thinkpro-object‘s covetous imagination. Since they are imaginary, they can be totally improbable.
Have you ever seen one?
TelevisionProgressive teaches the viewer how to be stupid.]
[Progressive TV constantly presents its core truth (falsehood) in a wide variety of programs.
The golden calves (standing for the television organizations) and victims (standing for the television viewers, who cannot talk back and are lured into surrendering their gold ornaments) are on the same side, the thinkpro-object side, against the thinkanti-object monsters.]
[The object is the victim.
Both thinkpro-victim and its objectified victims despise the exploiters.
The exploiters are responsible for the victims.
The exploiters are thinkanti-object and conscienceanti-object.
They are the bad ones.
They must be identified and destroyed by the good ones.]
[Here, I come to the foundational TVProgressive truth … I mean … lie.
Thinkmainstream_TV couples actors, who portray fabulously gifted people who love ‘the object that brings us into organization’, with actors, who portray ‘the victims that require us to organize’. The former are stand-ins for the golden calves. The latter are stand ins for the viewers, whose little gold pieces go into fashioning organization-loving golden calves).]
[Oh look, a rich person.
Must be a thinkanti-object.
Who will save the innocent victims?]
[How many TV shows have you seen where the wealth destroying Progressives are the bad guys?
None.
Then again, I suppose that ‘dramas showing how bureaucratic welfare rules produce a 70% illegitimacy rate’ might seem a little dreary. Better to write about evil millionaire poltergeists who threaten poor little people, even though these characters do not exist except in the Progressive theological framework.]
[Here is the mantra:
The good ones are victims of the bad ones.
The (representatives of the) good ones must identify and destroy the bad ones.
Do you want me to say it again and again and again and … ?]
[If you sample American headlines for the year 2013, you might ask yourself:
What do Paula Dean and George Zimmerman have in common?
ThinkProgressive_TV incessantly recounts a stereotypical battle between the good victims and the bad exploiters, involving some great and powerful person (often gifted with incredible immaterial attributes) coming to the assistance of a victim (who must be good because, by definition, victims are never bad).]
Summary of text [comment] page 72
[The previous blog brings me to Rene Girard, an insightful theorist who focused on the importance of scapegoats in our current Lebenswelt.
According to the intersecting nested forms underlying the message of the word ‘religion’, scapegoats trigger a projection, a thinkanti-object.
Who accuses?
The golden calves cultivate thinkpro-object. They point their well-manicured fingers.
The golden calves are always prepared to project thinkanti-object onto someone when disorder threatens.
This helps to explain why the selection of scapegoats appears almost random.]
