10/16/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 PU

[What must the imposer do in order to grasp sovereign power for “his” designs?

The imposer must sell “his” heart to the sovereigninfra, the (infra)sovereign religion.

The religionsov looks down upon and situates, not the person, but the subject.

So, the imposer becomes an instrument of the religionsov.

The imposer serves an object that brings subjects into organization (whether they want to or not). “He” can only thinkpro-object. “He” must deny unintended consequences.]

10/12/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 PS

[If an objectorganization is validated by each unforced conversion, then why not appeal to sovereign power in order to force conversion?

For example, why not ban smoking?

Would that not further validate the objectorganization?

The answer must be ‘no’.

Sovereign imposition of an objectorg reduces the subject’s responsibility and freedom. This is the opposite of building character.]

10/10/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 PQ

[The health-related business treats the individual, not as a subject, but as someone writ large.

The individual pays to form a business-person dyad to help coach “him”. The customer builds character. The customer gains both responsibility (awareness of “himself” in the mirror of the world3 in regards to something2H) and freedom (how my potential1H is situated by something2H).]

10/9/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 PP

Summary of text [comment] page 83

[Compare a sovereign religion to an infrasovereign institution that refuses to seek sovereign power.

For example, consider a health-related business devoted to (what it calls) “smart choices’”.

This business tries to covert the free person into a character who, either does not smoke tobacco products, or smokes responsibly.]

10/4/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 PM

[What does it mean for sovereign power to impose an object that brings the subject into organization.

The imposition forcibly reduces both the responsibilities and the freedoms of the subject.

What does the subject gain from this exchange?

Some would argue that everyone (the collective) gains by the good inherent in the object (such as a reduction in health care costs, greater health benefits, and so on, all deriving from the cessation of cigarette smoking).

That argument, however, merely re-asserts the intention of the pro-object. It ignores the subjective impact on the individual.]

10/3/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 PL

[An (infra)sovereign religion cannot look at the character of the person. That would require seeing in terms of thinkdivine, a perspective that puts both sovereign and subject into context.

The (infra)sovereign religion can only look at people in terms of thinkpro-object and (its projection of) thinkanti-object.

The subject is reduced to the one accepting the object that brings the subject into organization.

Conformity to thinkpro-object becomes the common core.]