Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.5AH1
Summary of text [comment] pages 37, 38 and 39
[What is this business with lawessential, lawacceptance and lawdenial?
It seems that I am dividing lawessential into to parallel horizontal nested forms (just like the parallel vertical nested forms). The normal context termini of these nested forms parallel forms would be lawacceptance_of_consequences and lawdenial_of_consequences.
This apparent duplication of the horizontal axis marks the occlusion of thinkdivine by thinkpro-object. It marks the moment when the mutual interpellation of thinkdivine and thinkgroup is outlawed by (infra)sovereign power (the sovereigninfra religion).]