06/8/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7CD

Summary of text [comment] page 61-62

[The closure of the Lebenswelt into thinkpro-object and thinkanti-object has been a regular feature of civilized history.

This closure defines “the establishment of religion” warned against in the first amendment of the American Constitution of the United States.]

06/5/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7CC

[Progressive ideology relies on Marx.

When Marx declared that “religion (specifically Christianity and Judaism)” was “the opiate of the masses”, he projected the dark side of “his object that would bring everyone into organization” onto two intriguing, yet inappropriate, victims; that is, Jesus and Moses.

For Marxist thinkpro-object, Jesus and Moses are thinkanti-object.

Jesus was born into a world officially closed to thinkdivine, a world full of iniquity, a world full of misguided suffering, a world filled with the toxic brews of resistance and resentment. Here was a world waiting for parables, hints of good news.

Moses was born into a world officially closed to thinkdivine, a world full of iniquity, a world full of misguided suffering, a world filled with the toxic brews of resistance and resentment. People were waiting for someone to say, “Let us go as a people into the desert to worship our God.”

Against this thinkdivine, Marx offers a delusion: the perfectability of humans.]

06/3/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7CA

Summary of text [comment] page 61-62

[Thinkpro-object accuses others of thinkanti-object.

Innocents are disfigured by accusations of thinkanti-object.

Ironically, immaterial disfiguration does not fit any Marxist schema of material exploitation. But that does not mitigate its effectiveness.

Some will say: If the accuser does not gain from the accusation, then the accusation must be true.

Indeed, the accuser may not materially gain.

But the accuser may immaterially gain, by asserting power, sowing fear and preaching falsehoods.]

06/2/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7BZ

Summary of text [comment] page 61-62

[Our Lebenswelt closes whenever a thinkgroup gains sovereign power and becomes thinkpro-object and thinkanti-object.

In practice, these two thinks are complementary ways of sinning.

One encourages the sins of sovereign power. Thinkpro-object forces their organizational objectives onto others.

The other fosters sins of resistance and resentment. One great temptation of anyone falsely accused of thinkanti-object is to embrace anger or bitterness.]

05/29/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7BX

[Thinkgroups do not always seek sovereign power.

When they do, thinkgroup fits this image of “idolatry”.

“The object that brings the person into organization” may become an “idol”.

Ambitious institutions, inspired by their own righteousness, will form alliances in order to attain sovereign power.

These alliances can turn deadly. Each organization wants sovereign power for its own organizational goals. Furthermore, the attainment of sovereign power incites competition for positional power within institutions.

The sovereign cannot contain the infighting “among (infra)sovereign religions” because “these fighting bands have taken over sovereign power”.

In this manner, idolatry eventually leads to sins of ‘man’ against ‘man’.]

05/28/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7BW

Summary of text [comment] page 60

In both the Old and New Testaments, sins are ascribed to idolatry. “Idolatry” defines “a power in its own right”. The sinner is a slave to this power.

Sin breeds sin. “Sins against God” lead to “sins of ‘man’ against ‘man'”.

The reverse also holds.

05/27/15

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 1.7BV

Summary of text [comment] page 60

‘Man’ is punished by having to live with ‘his’ own sin. The sinner faces anxiety, engenders wrath, condemns ‘himself’, magnifies ‘his’ misfortunes, and suffers impurity. The sinner trusts in soulless idols. The sinner expects no harm from false oaths (Wisdom 14:23-9).