Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XQ
08/1/19
07/31/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XP
Summary of text [comment] pages 86 and 87
[Let me return to the interscope of the thought experiment of ‘I choose something’.
I, seat of choice3b, elevates and embodies the actuality of my choice2b, which, in turn, emerges from and situates the potentials inherent in something1b.
The possibilities inherent in me1a underlie something2a, which is then situated as a potential.
What is the normal context for something2a?
A thought experiment3a.]
07/30/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XO
[Modernism fixates on the rules of non-contradiction.
And now, 50 years after Schoonenberg wrestled with a Zeitgeist full of false dichotomies, the modern way of thought is dying.
Long dismissed religious and philosophical ideas spring to life.
The concept of the nested form may seem new and bizarre.
But it is not new.
The premoderns wrote according to the nested form without explicitly knowing the structure of the nested form.
Soon enough, the category-based nested form will become routine.
Then, people will look back at the divided moderns and wonder:
How could they have been so stupid?]
07/29/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XN
[Modernism packs every idea into ‘this versus that’.]
07/26/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XM
[Moderns only recognize the logic of non-contradiction (the logic of secondness).
Moderns recognied a multitude of oppositions, such as the opposition between responsibility and freedom and the opposition between words and bondage.
But, these are not oppositions. They are co-oppositions.]
07/25/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XL
Summary of text [comment] pages 86 and 87
[Christian theologians are often on target.
Yet, they will never satisfy the Modern world.
Why?
Moderns recognize only one category, secondness, as valid.
The realm of actuality corresponds to the category of secondness.]
07/24/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XK
[The Scriptures were invaluable in providing a basis for a specialized theological language. This language probes the realm of possibility.
Theologians search Scripture for meaning, presence and message.
They aim to articulate how each heresy distorts generative, life-giving, relations.]
07/23/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XJ
[Theologians relied on Scripture in ‘their struggles to articulate how heretical distortions were wrong’. The Biblical scriptures are an excellent foundation because they witness relations. They do not name them or analyze them. Scriptures tell relation-filled stories. They present images, advice, poetry, and more. These evoke relational structures.]
07/22/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XI
[Theologians struggled to clearly articulate how heretical distortions were wrong. In the process, they constructed the ideas that Schoonenberg retells in his book ‘Man and Sin’.]
07/19/19
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XH
[Throughout history, Christian believers wrestled with heresies that focused on certain relational elements while ignoring the other elements. These heresies distorted the big picture.
Impressions that something was lacking were confirmed by subsequent events.
For example, many heresies often have a way of making some people look better and others look less.
Subsequent events confirm these impressions.]