[For the Progressive, the potential of the mandated healthy lifestyle outweighs the social costs of forced conversion.
Why?
The costs of compliance accrue to the subjects.
The benefits of imposition accrue to the elites.
What benefit does the elite accrue?
Objectsorg emerge from and situation the possibility of righteousness.]
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[What does my heart2 see in I, seat of choice3V?
My heart2 registers that my choice2V has been limited. My heart2 must realize only one something2H that I may choose1V. There is desire underlying my freedom.
I, seat of choice3V, has been dethroned.
I must submit to what the religioninfrasov has chosen for me.]
[Through market interventions, brute force and public humiliation, the sovereign takes responsibility for my smoking habit. The sovereign thwarts my freedom.]
[What does my heart see in the mirror of the world3H?
My heart sees the romantic view of brotherly smoking diminished.
My heart finds rational arguments against smoking tobacco products.
My heart sees smokers demonized.
Rational arguments may not be sufficient for attaining the organizational objectives of the anti-smoking lobby, even though the health argument can easily be understood. Demonization does the trick.]
[If cigarettes2H increase in price, decrease in availability and otherwise come under the mandates of a sovereign, then my choices2V are correspondingly limited.
Even if I maintain the same desire1H for cigarettes2H, the sovereign takes my power to choose3V from me by mandating a healthy lifestyle.]
[Consider the single actuality of both ‘my choice2V’ and ‘something2H’.
My choice2V reflects value1V. Something2H reveals my desire1H.
If I were to give up cigarettes on my own, my intersection would look like the following.]
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[The imposition by a religioninfrasov initiates a transition from interscope to intersection. Here, the transition marks the start of a forced conversion.]
