Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HV
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[In the modern view, words are opposed to bondage.
This is misleading.
Words are co-opposed to bondage.]
12/21/17
12/20/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HU
[In the modern view, responsibilities are opposed to freedom.
This is misleading.
Responsibilities and freedom are in co-opposition.]
12/19/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HT
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[In the modern view, thoughts are opposed to deeds.
This is misleading.
Thoughts are co-opposed to deeds.]
12/18/17
12/15/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HR
[Or, on the horizontal axis, words3H2 encompass bondage2(1H)).
Bondage2(1H)) lays the groundwork for words3H(2’.
Bondage2H(1H)) reveals desire1H.]
12/14/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HQ
[On the vertical axis, thoughts3V(2 encompass deeds2(1V)).
Deeds2(1V)) lay the groundwork for thoughts3V(2.
Deeds2V(1V)) reveal values1V.
On the horizontal axis, responsibilities3H(2 encompass freedom2(1H)).
Freedom2(1H)) lays the groundwork for responsibilities3H(2’.
Freedom2H(1H)) reveals desire1H.]
12/13/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HP
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[The categorical anatomy of the thought experiment of ‘I choose something’ may be portrayed as an intersection.
Two intersecting nested forms cross one another at the actuality of my choice2V and‘something2H.
It looks like a mandala of the heart2.]
12/12/17
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 HO
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[My heart2 is a single actuality filled with contradictions.
Yet, it obeys the laws of non-contradiction.
My heart2 cannot resolve these contradictions, because this single actuality emerges and situates two potentials.
This single actuality also is contextualized by two normal contexts.
What a mess.]
12/11/17
12/8/17
