Summary of text [comment] page 83

[The two nested forms may either interscope or intersect.

They interscope according to the previous diagram.

I, seat of choice₃ belongs to a higher category.

Why?

It virtually situates the thought experiment_{3-lower level}.

In other words, a possibility inherent in something (revealing my desire)_{2, lower level} offers the opportunity for ‘I_{3, higher level}’ to make ‘a choice_{2, higher level}’.

The two levels, for sensible construction, are situation and content.]

[The actualities of something_2a and my choice_2b are readily apparent to others.

My choice_2b virtually emerges from and situates my desire_2a.

So let me write these two nested forms out explicitly.

I, seat of choice_3b( my choice_2b( something corresponding to value_1b))

Thought experiment_3a( something corresponding to desire_2a( me_1a))]