06/15/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MN

[In the corresponding intersection, the potential of me1H is situated by my heart2 through the normal context of the thought experiment3H or mirror of the world3H.

In this configuration, one can imagine how the vertical nested form may be regulated by the horizontal.

By contextualizing (permitting, inspiring, regulating, dictating, insisting, and so on) the heart2, the horizontal normal context3H influences the nested form containing I, seat of choice3V as well as the potential of something that underlies my choice1V.]

06/12/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MK

[How does this resonate with Schoonenberg’s claim that we have the freedom to serve God or Satan?

Freedom goes with both the potential of the person1a plus an actuality, the something contextualized by the thought experiment2a.

The thought experiment3a reflects illumination by social elites (or, in general, the Zeitgeist).]

06/5/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 MF

[In the above examples, what do I desire?

I want to get along.

Therefore, the elites must never be satisfied with me.

They will always be morally superior in order to force me to pretend to desire things that I would never would desire on my own.

I desire to be left alone.

What I do to accomplish that desire validates the values that valorize elite moral superiority.]

06/4/18

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 ME

[How did we get this way?

It started with the first singularity.

Humans adopted a new way of talking, speech alone talk, leaving behind the referential world of hand speech talk.

Speech alone talk allows us to create purely symbolic orders3a, specialized languages3a, thought experiments3a and mirrors of the world3a, whose unintended consequences (lawessential) can be ignored, and therefore must be ignored, by the elites who benefit from the ‘something2a’ that emerges and situates the possibilities inherent in me1a.]