08/6/19

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XT

[Consider the discipline of experimental psychology.

Every psychological experiment where the subject chooses something exhibits this two-level interscope.

The experiment investigates the situational nested form:

I, seat of choice3b( my choice2b( potential of something1b))

However, the experimentalists inject a perspective into the adjacent and lower level, as content.

The name ‘thought experiment3a’ seems appropriate. Does it not?]

07/31/19

Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 XP

Summary of text [comment] pages 86 and 87

[Let me return to the interscope of the thought experiment of ‘I choose something’.

I, seat of choice3b, elevates and embodies the actuality of my choice2b, which, in turn, emerges from and situates the potentials inherent in something1b.

The possibilities inherent in me1a underlie something2a, which is then situated as a potential.

What is the normal context for something2a?

A thought experiment3a.]