[The exercise of the heart_2a(1a)) is the general term for freedom_2a(1a)) or bondage_2a(1a)).

“Service” seems to go with my choice_2b.

‘Either God or Satan’ associates with ‘the thought experiment_3a’ as well as ‘the potential within each person to establish a set of different habits in response to the experiment_3a’.

These different habits are like ‘the person talking back to the experiment_2a’, where ‘the utterances of the whole person_2a’ image or point to ‘something_2a that the person desires’.

The thought experiment_3a interpellates desire_1a.]

[The thought experiment where ‘I choose something’ models as two interscoping nested forms and provides an opportunity to explore Schoonenberg’s statement.]

We exercise our freedom in serving either God or Satan.

[The mirror of the world_3a reflects a symbolic order_3a.

Responsibilities and words express the character of ‘a system of…_3a’.

Correspondingly, the potentials within me_1a are already refined, cut into interpellations, finite in number, because they well up in response to the normal context configured as ‘a system of…_3a’.

Freedom and bondage express the character of ‘… differences_1a’.

Both obligations and exercises of the heart share an actuality_2a that corresponds to an utterance, emerging from and situating the potentials inherent in me.]

[What is to be found in the thought experiment_3a?

The thought experiment_3a is the content-level normal context.

Like the system…_3a in _parole, the thought experiment_3a seems to be referential.

We project referentiality into the thought experiment.

But, it also exists as a symbolic order.

The system…_3a sets the normal context for the potentiation of …differences_1a.

Parole_2a exists as a system of differences_3a-1a.]

[Have I arrived at another way to speculate about responsibility (in virtue) and words (in sin)? ]