Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LZ
05/25/18
05/24/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LY
[All political resistance is accused of hating the victims.
The political party of the Progressive elites longs to make the accusation.
The political party of the common folk longs to avoid the accusation.]
05/23/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LX
[Progressive elites buy votes with various pro-objects.
These pro-objects nominally protect the victims.
In fact, these purported victims depend on largess from the Central Government. Indulgences validate the recipient’s victimhood. The recipient’s victimhood validates Progressive organizational objects.
The common word for “indulgence” is “entitlement”.]
05/22/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LW
[Some American citizens sell their votes to the (infra)sovereign religion or, even more mind boggling, are convinced that the (infra)sovereign religions are on their side.
These are the so-called ‘low information voters’ who vote along tribal affiliation, as if, through elections, one tribe can legitimately subjugate the opposing tribes.
Forget the 10 commandments!]
05/21/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LV
[How is this possible?
Americans are ‘free’. However, voters have consistently chosen ‘somethings2a’ that have empowered the Central Government (State and City governments no longer rule independent of the Center).
Or have they?
Their votes against the aggressive (infra)sovereign party go to the the other party.
This other party takes the passive common folk stance of meeting ritual demands in order to avoid accusations by the (infra)sovereign party.
Big Government Liberalism wins either way.
How crazy is that?]
05/18/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LU
[Here is a funny twist.
The elites in one political party openly represent the (infra)sovereign religion of Big Government Liberalism.
The elites in the other political party say that they do not belong to the religion, but behave as is if they do.
The same co-opposition of words3a(2a and bondage2a(1a) that marked Judaism at the time of Jesus also marks the Public Cult of Progressivism today.
05/17/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LT
[Turn on Progressive TV to see a parade similar to the Second Temple.
The elites of Big government Liberalism demand ritual purity. They demand that the average citizen give up “his” stuff. They say that the average citizen does not get along. They have buckets of nasty labels for the deplorables.
They say that the average citizen is intolerant unless “he” conforms to the multitudinous ritual decrees of the Progressive state, universities and various other sovereign-loving affiliations.]
05/16/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LS
Summary of text [comment] page 83
[Does this sound vaguely familiar?
Do the previous blogs sound familiar in contemporary America?
The average American citizen just wants to get along. The average citizen just wants to keep “his” stuff.]
05/15/18
05/14/18
Man and Sin by Piet Schoonenberg (1964) 2.3 LQ
[Since the Second Temple Law was complicated and self-contradictory, accusations could always occur (especially if one attracted attention).
This threat of accusation made it easy for common folk to choose a lack of self worth in order to avoid catastrophic accusations.]