[It does not matter whether the illuminated something2a is free (that is, presented without cost) or prohibited (that is, presented at enormous cost), the potential inherent in me1a changes as I adapt to sovereign impositions. My potential is diminished.]
[IF the mirror of the world3a brings something2a into relation with the potential in me to be the person that the mirror of the world says I am1a,
THEN words3a(2a are co-opposed to bondage2a(1a)).]
Summary of text [comment] pages 83 and 84
[IF the mirror of the world3a illuminates something2a that belongs to the potential inherent in me1a,
THEN responsibility3a(2a is co-opposed to freedom2a(1a)).]
Summary of text [comment] pages 83 and 84
[The co-opposition of responsibility and freedom allows us to appreciate Schoonenberg ‘s text more fully.
Schoonenberg’s key opposition is between bondage and freedom.
Bondage is in co-opposition with words (expressions and impositions of organizationalobjectives and thinkgroup).
Freedom is in co-opposition to responsibility.]
[Modern propaganda asserts that sovereign words (pro-object rhetoric and legislation) do not change incentives’
This assertion underlies the static economic analysis that always fails to predict the cost of central government impositions.]
[Modern propaganda asserts that freedom has no context (responsibility).
This implication underlies the bondage of the welfare state.]
[Modernists habitually manipulate the meaning of words in order to mislead subjects. The objects that bring individuals into organization are presented through misleading oppositions, such as the slogan, “responsibility versus freedom”.
Such is the nature of modern propaganda.]
Summary of text [comment] pages 83 and 84
Schoonenberg wrote that we exercise freedom in serving either God or Satan.
[The previous round of blogs show that “freedom” is defined as the capacity to enter into responsibilities. Greater freedom means greater responsibility.
The modern opposition between “freedom” and “responsibility” conceals pre- and postmodern concepts of the co-opposition of freedom and responsibility.
The true oppositions are between freedom and bondage and between words and responsibilities.]
[The camps of America may be instituted on the basis of class action lawsuits, brought by the sovereign central government, toward particular individuals or classes of individuals.
Since no individual can afford the cost of litigation, the individual must plea bargain.
As part of the plea bargain, the individual is sent to a camp.
Thus, the court system, created to serve justice, may be bent to serve the sovereign’s social justice.]
